Evolution — an Unproven Theory

Taken from “Noah and the Great Flood: proof and effects”

decent of man

For over a century evolutionists have promoted their theory that organisms inherently improve themselves through progressive inherited change over time. They have done this by claiming it to be a scientific fact rather than just an unproven theory. They have managed to include it in college studies. They have done such a great job that sadly, even Christians have accepted their theories as truth. Even though there is no evidence within the fossil records to support evolution, there are a great many people who believe there is. This is mostly due to the fact that evolution has been propagandized as science, and has been taught in our universities as if it was fact rather than just a theory.

Even though evolution has not and cannot be proven, it has been advocated as scientific fact, to the point that even Christians are misled. A quote by professor and paleontologist David M. Raup, show how bad this problem is.

“One of the ironies of the evolution-creation debate is that the creationists have accepted the mistaken notion that the fossil record shows a detailed and orderly progression and they have gone to great lengths to accommodate this ‘fact’ in their Flood geology.”   (David M. Raup, Evolution and the Fossil Record, Science, Vol 213, July 17,1981)

The theory of evolution demands evidence of fossils of transitional specimens, the missing links. Yet, there are absolutely no transitional specimens to be found anywhere. There are claims, but none actually exist. Most amazing is the fact that Darwin, himself, wrote about this as did other evolutionists.

“Why if species have descended from other species by fine gradations do we not see everywhere innumerable transitional forms?… why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?…. why do we not now find closely-linking intermediate varieties? This difficulty for a long time quite confounded me…… Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory.” (Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species,  Skyros Publishing, 2015, p. 80 & 157)

Harvard evolutionist, Stephen Jay Gould also addressed this problem: “I regard the failure to find a clear ‘vector of progress’ in life’s history as the most puzzling fact of the fossil record.” (Stephen Jay Gould, The Ediacaran Experiment,  Natural History No. 93, February 1984, p.14-23.)

Another example from paleontologist David Kitts: “The fossil record doesn’t even provide any evidence in support of the Darwinian theory except in the weak sense that the fossil record is compatible with it, just as it is compatible with other evolutionary theories and revolutionary theories, and special creationist theories and even ahistorical theories.”  (David B Kitts, Search for the Holy Transformation, quoted from Institute for Creation Research, Scientific Creationism.)

 “Evolution, at least in the sense that Darwin speaks of it, cannot be detected within the lifetime of a single observer.” (David B. Kitts, Paleontology and Evolutionary Theory,  Evolution, Vol. 28; September 1974, p. 466.)

Evolution claims to be a science, yet it goes against several basic scientific laws such as the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics; the Law of Conservation and the Law of Energy Decay; Mendel’s Laws of Genetics and the Law of Biogenesis among others. These are basic scientific laws that are never broken, yet evolution claims to be science even though these basic laws all say evolution is impossible.

“No exception to the second law of thermodynamics has ever been found — not even a tiny one.” (E. H. Lieb and Jakob Yngvason, “A Fresh Look at Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics,” Physics Today (vol. 53, April 2000), p. 32.)

New DNA research, as well as gene and enzyme research, has also proven that evolution of any species is impossible. There is an enormous amount of evidence that disproves evolution, far more than could be included here. I have included this information in my book “Noah and the Great Flood: proof and effects” as have other researchers.

Christian Schwabe alludes to the problem with evolutionists of refusing to acknowledge the problems that evolution faces as new facts come to light;

“One might ask why the neo-darwinian paradigm does not weaken or disappear if it is at odds with critical factual information. The reasons are not necessarily scientific ones but rather may be rooted in human nature.” (Christian Schwabe, On the Validity of Molecular Evolution, Trends in Biochemical Sciences, July 1986, p. 282)

The scientific establishment will never admit anything that goes against what they believe. To do so would be to admit that the whole theory of evolution is wrong. Anything that doesn’t fit into their thinking is simply ignored or they attempt to explain it away, as evolutionist Stephen Gould stated:

“Facts do not speak for themselves, they are read in light of theory”  (Stephen Jay Gould, Ever Since Darwin, W.W. Norton, New York, 1977,  p 161-162)

In other words, the facts are made to fit the theory, rather than the theory being made to represent the actual facts. This attitude results in far different interpretations of the same scientific data than that of the creationist as evolutionist Boyce Rensberger admits: 

“There can be no observations without an immense apparatus of preexisting theory…..what counts as a relevant observation depends upon a theoretical frame into which it is to be placed. Repeatable observations that do not fit into an existing frame have a way of disappearing from view, and the experiments that produced them are not revisited.”  (Richard Lewontin, Review of The Demon-Haunted World, by Carl Sagan. In New York Review of Books, January 9, 1997.)

“The fact is that scientists are not really as objective and dispassionate in their work as they would like you to think. Most scientists first get their ideas about how the world works not through rigorously logical processes but through hunches and wild guesses. As individuals, they often come to believe something to be true long before they assemble the hard evidence that will convince somebody else that it is.” (Boyce Rensberger, How the World Works, NY, William Morrow, 1986,  p18.)

Evolution is a theory that will one day pass away, just like the flat earth belief and the one-time theory that the sun, moon, and stars rotated around the earth, it will be forgotten. There is a constant tide of information disproving evolution. Science will and essentially has already disproven the theory of evolution. At the rate that new scientific information is mounting up, it will only be a matter of time before the scientific community will have to renounce evolution. Dr. John Ashton speaks of this in his excellent book “Evolution Impossible.”
    “I could find not a single published scientific paper reporting the evidence that supports the fundamental requirement of evolution that new meaningful genetic information arises by chance. Instead, I have found much-published data showing that it is impossible for new purposeful genetic information of any significance for evolution to arise by chance.” (John Ashton, Evolution Impossible, Master Books, Green Forest, Ar., 2012, p.22)

“In that great window to the past–the fossil record–we only find distinct plant and animal kinds, with no transitional forms. With the exception of creatures that have become extinct…. ALL life forms found in the fossils are just like those presently alive! To say it again: All non-extinct plant and animal fossils are the same as creatures now alive on the earth. There is NO evidence of evolution in the fossils.”  (Evolution-Facts.org, Effects of The Flood, Evolution Encyclopedia Vol. 2, Part 1)

The very philosophy of evolution denies the act of creation and the very existence of God. It denies that man was created in the image of God. Since man has evolved higher than the animals, he is the master of the planet. It is the basis for all the anti-God systems that have plagued mankind. It was the basis for Hitler’s Nazism and Karl Marx’s supposed scientific basis for communism.

 Professor D.M.S. Watson, a leading evolutionary biologist of his day demonstrates the anti-God thinking that motivates the evolutionist:
“Evolution is a theory universally accepted not because it can be proven by logically coherent evidence to be true, but because the only alternative, special creation, is clearly incredible.” (D.M.S. Watson, Adaptation, Nature, 124:233, 1929)

Jerry Blount: Books, Biography, Blog, Audiobooks, Kindle – https://www.amazon.com/-/e/B06XK4GJT1

One thought on “Evolution — an Unproven Theory

  1. Evolution would appear to be a Deductive Process – General Genetic Attributes being Honed to Specific GeneticTrates by Natural or Guided selection. This process of Selection ( Natural or Guided) can be observed scientificly or historically.

    However the claim that Evolution is a Inductive process ( specific Genetic trates creating new General attributes by Selection has not been observed.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s