Science and The Bible VS Evolution

Displaying pixabay.comOn several recent posts, there have been many that believe in evolution, that have made comments against what I have written or against the comments Christians have posted. It is clear that they think that if you believe in creation, then you don’t believe in science. That is not true. Science has made our lives better and easier in many ways. Certainly, much of what I was posting from the Bible concerning nature, medical, sanitation, and the universe would be considered scientific. There have been many great scientists that believed in creation and the Bible. They saw no conflict between the two. Scientists such as Isaac Newton, Leonardo Da Vinci, Francis Bacon, Samuel Morse, Blaise Pascal, Albert Einstein, and Galileo, just to name a few.

Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind.“ – Albert Einstein, 1941

Evolution, on the other hand, is a scientific theory that has never been proven but has been taught in our universities, as if it was a proven fact. Tens of thousands of people believe evolution is a proven fact, simply because that is what they were taught. Most students accept anything their professor say as absolute truth.

Physicist Mark Singham, speaking on the trust that college students have for their professors and in what they are being taught.

“And I use that trust to effectively brainwash them…….We only introduce arguments and evidence that supports the currently accepted theories and omit or gloss over any evidence to the contrary.”

Not all scientists believe in evolution. The number that is rejecting evolution is growing every day. There are roughly one thousand scientists that align themselves with the Institute for Creation Research. No new scientific papers are being published that would support evolution. However, there is a constant flow of papers being published that contain new discoveries that show evolution is impossible.

    “I could find not a single published scientific paper reporting the evidence that supports the fundamental requirement of evolution that new meaningful genetic information arises by chance. Instead, I have found much-published data showing that it is impossible for new purposeful genetic information of any significance for evolution to arise by chance.” (Dr. John Ashton, Evolution Impossible)

      “The new studies in molecular science are showing that each class of species at a molecular level is unique, isolated, and unlinked by intermediates. Thus molecules, like fossils, have failed to provide the elusive intermediates so long sought by evolutionary biology.” (Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis)

Science will disprove evolution

When I speak of evolution, I am talking about macro-evolution. I am not referring to micro-evolution, the changes within a species. These fall under Mendel’s Law of Genetics and are not evolution.

Science involves the observation and measurements of nature and the natural processes. This is not possible with the prehistoric past. Evolutionists believe that you can take the natural processes of today and apply them back to the beginning of time. This theory of uniformitarianism is beginning to be rejected by today’s scientists.

The scientific Law of Biogenesis states the observations have shown that life can only come from life. Life cannot come from non-life. According to this scientific law, it would have been impossible for life to have begun as the evolutionists claim.

There is no known process by which genetic information can be added to an organism’s genetic code. If it’s DNA cannot be added to, then it is impossible for any organism to evolve into a higher form. Science has demonstrated that over time living organisms lose genetic information; they do not gain it. Biological evolution is simply not possible. The Bible makes it clear that all creatures were created accordingly to their kind. (Genesis 1:24)

The physical processes of the universe all fall into two fundamental laws of science, The First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics. All physical processes deal with energy and the interchanges of it. Even matter itself is a type of energy that under the right conditions can be converted into other forms.

The First Law is the Law of Conservation, which states that nothing is being created or destroyed. We see this Law displayed in the scriptures. Exodus 20:11 tells that creation is complete. Hebrews 4:3 states that the Lord is sustaining all things. In Hebrews 1:3, it is written that God is no longer creating anything, nor is he allowing anything to be destroyed. If nothing new can be created, then new life or species cannot be evolving or ever have evolved.

The Second Law is the Law of Energy Decay, which states that in all natural processes there is a net loss of energy, which results in entropy and decay. It states that any system left to itself will become disordered and eventually run down and die. The Bible speaks of this in Genesis 3:17, Hebrews 1:11, and Isaiah 51:6. However, according to the evolutionists the Universe and the Earth has done exactly the opposite. They consider a basic principle of evolution, is the continual development and increasing order and complexity throughout the universe. According to “science” that is not taking place and under current conditions, it is impossible, since the current processes of nature are processes of conservation and decay. Evolution is in direct conflict with these proven scientific laws, whereas, creation and the Bible are in direct alignment with these laws.

One of the main themes of evolution is the belief that certain types of DNA sequences freely mutate and develop new functions that allow for new creatures to evolve. The discovery of multiple codes embedded in the protein-coding regions of genes has shown that evolution through mutation is not possible.

   “One hundred and fifty years have already passed during which it has been said that the evolution of the species is a fact but, without giving real proofs of it and without even a principle of explaining it. During the last one hundred and fifty years of research that has been carried out along this line (to prove the theory), there has been no discovery of anything. It is simply a repetition in different ways of what Darwin said in 1859. This lack of results is unforgivable in a day when molecular biology has really opened the veil covering the mystery of reproduction and heredity.” (G. Salet, Hasard et Certitude: Le Transformisme dent la Biologie Actuelle)

    “One might ask why the neo-Darwinian paradigm does not weaken or disappear if it is at odds with critical factual information. The reasons are not necessarily scientific ones but rather may be rooted in human nature.” (Christian Schwabe, On the Validity of Molecular Evolution, Trends in Biochemical Sciences)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s