There is no fossil evidence to support the “ape-man” image, despite this fact, the theory that we descended from apes is taught in classrooms as if it is a proven fact. The evolutionist’s zeal to promulgate their view has led to deception and outright lies. Many examples used to promote their existence have been fraudulent such as the Piltdown Man. Or were wild guesses based on insufficient evidence such as Nebraska Man. Artist depictions based on nothing more than the evolutionist imagination of what he would like to see have made their way into the classrooms. Even though these renditions have been proved to be false or wrong, they are still being used in textbooks to brainwash our children. Those who believe in human evolution do so because they want it to be true and will do anything to make it seem true even when it is obviously not, as the following examples will show.
A long, long time ago there was absolutely nothing. And then, out of nowhere, the universe just brought itself into being. Miraculously, conditions were just right for a micro speck of goo within a puddle of goo to suddenly spring to life. I know that the proven scientific Law of Biogenesis states that this is impossible, but this is a fairly tale and anything is possible.
This speck over millions and millions of years eventually evolved into a fish. This fish met a fish of the opposite sex, and they had more fish. I wonder where another fish of the opposite sex came from? But, this is a fairy tale, and with fairy tales and theories anything is possible. According to evolutionists, given enough time, anything is possible. That is why it is so important to them that the earth is billions of years old. Research has shown that the statistical probability of forming even a single enzyme, the building block of the gene, which is, in turn, the building block of the cell, is 1 in 10 to the 40,000th. This means that it would require more attempts for the formation of one enzyme than there are atoms in all the stars of all the galaxies in the entire known universe. Yet, evolutionist not only believes this happened but that it happened more than once. That is the beauty of theories and fairly tales. You can make up anything! And someone will probably believe it!
After a few million more years this fish decided it wanted to live on land. So it began to stick its head out of the water and gulp air. After a few more millions of years, it developed lungs instead of gills. Then it decided to climb out of the water and walk on land using its fins as legs. After a few more millions of years, its fins eventually turned into legs. I wonder how it survived all those millions of years before it got legs? With fins, it would have been very difficult and slow to get around. Other creatures would have been extremely rare if any existed. What did it eat? Maybe it ate grass. No, there was no grass yet. Oh well, it’s just a fairy tale.
After a billion years or so, this fish evolved into a dinosaur. I know, the scientific First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics proves this cannot happen. But, this is just a theory, I mean fairy tale. Supposedly some dinosaurs weighed up to 100 metric tons. What would an animal that size evolve from? There was no other creature even close for it to descend from.
Eventually, the dinosaur decided it wanted to fly. Its front legs slowly began to evolve into wings. So for a million years or so, the dinosaur went through life with two bad front legs as they were changing. And then for millions of more years it had lived with two bad wings before they eventually became real functional wings. During these millions of years the dinosaur’s bones become hollow, it grew feathers, and it completely changed its DNA. It was now a bird and could fly.
Let’s go back to the fish with legs. After billions of years, it turned into all kinds of marvelous creatures. One of these creatures was a monkey. After millions and millions of more years, this monkey learned to walk upright and became a man. And this is why evolutionists to this very day believe they came from a monkey’s uncle.
Those that believe in evolution instead of creation say the Bible stories are just fairy tales. They couldn’t be real. They always use Jonah and the whale as an example. They are not willing to believe that a whale could swallow a man and spit him out three days later. But, they willingly believe the fairy tale of evolution. They refuse to believe in the virgin birth. Is it harder to believe that the Holy Spirit could implant a seed in a woman and that she would give birth than it is to believe that life just spontaneously happened out of nothing?
I believe it takes much more faith to believe how a state of absolute nothingness can bring about intelligent processes and results than it does to believe in an omnipotent God that created all things and is responsible for the intelligent design of the universe. I realize that those that don’t know Jesus have never experienced his presence. And that he hides from those that rejects him and believe themselves wise in the ways of the world (Mt. 11:25, Lk. 10:21). Many would much rather believe that the Bible is all old myths and ancient stories. They prefer to believe that God doesn’t exist, rather than believe there is a God that will someday judge them for their sins.
They claim the Bible is a book of fairy tales, Yet they believe the biggest (lie) fairy tale of all.
The very philosophy of evolution denies the act of creation and the very existence of God. It denies that man was created in the image of God. Since man has evolved higher than the animals, he is the master of the planet. Evolution teaches that creation is taking place through nature’s evolutionary processes, even though this contradicts the basic laws of science. Evolution takes the focus from God and places it on man. It is the basis for all the anti-God systems that have plagued mankind. It was the basis for Hitler’s Nazism and Karl Marx’s supposed scientific basis for communism.
Evolution is nothing more than theories that have been promoted and taught as scientific facts. It promotes a materialistic and self-seeking world view. Evolution goes against proven scientific laws. (Check out my earlier posts).
This is the point where some of you are tempted to leave a negative comment or call me crazy. But, before you do. I challenge you to do your own research. See why the basic laws of science prove that evolution is impossible. Laws such as the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, the Law of Biogenesis, and Mendel’s Law of Genetics. Check the latest finding in microbiology and molecular science. I challenge you to do your own research. Forget what you have been told or taught or what I have said. Learn the truth for yourself. Do this rather than leave a comment that simply reflects someone else’s thinking.
If evolution is wrong, why is it still be taught and promoted as science? Continue reading
New scientific discoveries are pointing to a much younger earth. An Earth that is 6,000 to 10,000 years old. This post is the third and last in the series showing still more evidence for a young earth.
Cosmic Dust: There is a constant rate of cosmic dust particles entering the earth’s atmosphere from space and then settling to the earth’s surface. According to NASA, there are 200 million tons of dust coming to earth every year. If the earth were 4.6 billion years old as evolutionists claim, there would be a layer of meteoritic dust nearly a half mile in thickness over the entire world. The same would be true of the moon. In fact, one of the concerns before the moon landing was that the astronauts would sink into the dust upon landing on the moon. Of course, that didn’t happen, which speaks of a very young moon, earth, and universe. (G.S. Hawkins, Ed., Meteor Orbits and Dust, published by NASA, 1976)
Evolutionists had long held to the fact that the earth and moon are about the same age. It is believed, by many, that the Earth and its moon are billions of years old. If that were true, the moon would by now have built up a 20-60 mile layer of dust on it! Continue reading
New scientific discoveries are pointing to a much younger earth. One that is 6,000 to 10,000 years old. This is the second post in this series showing the evidence for a young earth.
The faint young sun paradox: The Sun derives energy by the thermonuclear conversion of hydrogen into helium. Over the Sun’s lifetime, the thermonuclear reactions would, according to theory, gradually change the composition of the core of the Sun and alter the Sun’s overall physical structure. Because of this process, the Sun would gradually grow brighter with age. Thus, if the Sun is indeed 4.6 billion years old, it should have brightened by nearly 40% over this time. This means that if billions of years were true, the sun would have been much fainter in the past. However, there is no evidence that the sun was fainter at any time in the earth’s history. Astronomers call this the ‘faint young sun paradox’, but it is no paradox at all if the sun is only as old as the Bible says—about 6,000 years.
Evolutionists believe that life appeared on the earth about 3.8 billion years ago. But if that timescale were true, the sun would be 25% brighter today than it was back then. This implies that the earth would have been frozen at an average temperature of –3ºC. However, most paleontologists believe that, if anything, the earth was warmer in the past. (Jonathan Sarfati, Our Steady Sun: A Problem For Billions of Years) Continue reading
The standard secular timeline is that the earth is some 4.6 billion years old. The theory of an old earth is in direct contrast to what the Bible teaches. The Bible gives us a chronological and genealogical history of people and events beginning from the time of creation, throughout history, making the earth a little over 6000 years old. An old earth is important for the evolutionists. They believe that given enough time, anything is possible, even evolution. There is a lot of controversy over the various dating methods; many have been shown to be in error by millions of years. I will be deal with these in later posts.
New scientific discoveries are pointing to a much younger earth. One that is 6,000 to 10,000 years old. I will be posting many of these over the next month starting with the following:
The Shrinking Sun: For the past one hundred and fifty years, astronomers have made regular measurements of the diameter of the sun. These measurements have shown that the sun is shrinking at the rate of five feet per hour. At its rate of shrinkage, as little as 50,000 years ago the sun would have been so large that our oceans would boil. 100,000 years ago the sun would have been twice its present size.But in far less time than 50,000 years, life here would have ceased to exist. Studies have shown that if the size of the sun or the earth’s distance from it, were either slightly greater or smaller, life on Earth could not exist.
On several recent posts, there have been many that believe in evolution, that have made comments against what I have written or against the comments Christians have posted. It is clear that they think that if you believe in creation, then you don’t believe in science. That is not true. Science has made our lives better and easier in many ways. Certainly, much of what I was posting from the Bible concerning nature, medical, sanitation, and the universe would be considered scientific. There have been many great scientists that believed in creation and the Bible. They saw no conflict between the two. Scientists such as Isaac Newton, Leonardo Da Vinci, Francis Bacon, Samuel Morse, Blaise Pascal, Albert Einstein, and Galileo, just to name a few.
“Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind.“ – Albert Einstein, 1941
Evolution, on the other hand, is a scientific theory that has never been proven but has been taught in our universities, as if it was a proven fact. Tens of thousands of people believe evolution is a proven fact, simply because that is what they were taught. Most students accept anything their professor say as absolute truth.
Physicist Mark Singham, speaking on the trust that college students have for their professors and in what they are being taught.
“And I use that trust to effectively brainwash them…….We only introduce arguments and evidence that supports the currently accepted theories and omit or gloss over any evidence to the contrary.”
Not all scientists believe in evolution. The number that is rejecting evolution is growing every day. There are roughly one thousand scientists that align themselves with the Institute for Creation Research. No new scientific papers are being published that would support evolution. However, there is a constant flow of papers being published that contain new discoveries that show evolution is impossible.
“I could find not a single published scientific paper reporting the evidence that supports the fundamental requirement of evolution that new meaningful genetic information arises by chance. Instead, I have found much-published data showing that it is impossible for new purposeful genetic information of any significance for evolution to arise by chance.” (Dr. John Ashton, Evolution Impossible)
“The new studies in molecular science are showing that each class of species at a molecular level is unique, isolated, and unlinked by intermediates. Thus molecules, like fossils, have failed to provide the elusive intermediates so long sought by evolutionary biology.” (Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis)
Science will disprove evolution